Thursday, October 3, 2013

Etsy Townhall Meeting: Reaction

Etsy CEO Chad Dickerson announced in a town hall meeting on Tuesday that Etsy, among other changes, was going to allow shops to use manufacturers. The Internet reacted something like this:


But—let's be real here, guys. Etsy exists to make money so that it can keep existing. The question of an IPO isn't an if, it's a when.

Who makes the most money for Etsy? Here's a hint: it's not me with my under $50 items of which I list, at most, 30 at a time in my shop. It's the people who list 400 items at a go, or people who sell $2000 tables (or whatever). In terms of business viability, in whose interest should Etsy be more invested? (Whether or not that answer is the same as whose interest Etsy should be more invested in from an ethical standpoint is another issue.)

That's where Etsy seems to want to go: helping and promoting the "big small" businesses: ones that can mass produce (in relatively limited quantities), have multiple employees, but aren't any kind of national brand name. That seems to be the route they're taking. From that perspective, limiting stores to selling "handmade" from the strictly true definition is just that: limiting. I do not begrudge the people with enough capital to hire a few casters or professional photographers or SEO experts or screenprinters or whatever; I do not begrudge Etsy's business-minded decision to make the website better and easier for their most productive customers.

Here's what I do mind: dishonesty.

Be honest with us (and yourself), Etsy: you are not about valuing handmade products. Startups and ingenuity, sure. But the truth is, the vast majority of "handmade" isn't done by trendy hipster designers in their Williamsburg bachelor pads. It's laid-off people who can't find other work and are desperate for any extra income, it's hobbyists who need some extra cash, it's the SAHM whose husband hasn't gotten a raise for the third year in a row despite the cost of everything else in the world steadily rising. If you don't want to help them, that's fine. The least you could do, Etsy, is be honest about it.

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

What I Read: Beloved

I finished reading Beloved yesterday. It was good, but difficult. Some books are good, but easy—The Crying of Lot 49; some books are just easy—The Spy Who Came in From The Cold; and some are good but difficult. Beloved was the most difficult book I've read yet on the list, maybe even more than The Gravedigger's Daughter. Part of it is due to the subject matter, but part of it is also due to Morrison's incredibly complex writing. Subclauses and parentheticals and asides are all over the place:

The grandmother, Baby Suggs, was dead, and the sons, Howard and Buglar, had run away by the time they were thirteen years old—as soon as merely looking in a mirror shattered it (that was the signal for Buglar); as soon as two tiny hand prints appeared in the cake (that was it for Howard). Neither boy waited to see more; another kettleful of chickpeas smoking in a heap on the floor; soda crackers crumbled and strewn in a line next to the doorsill.

Even the educated colored: the long-school people, the doctors, the teahers, the paper-writers and businessmen had a hard row to hoe. In addition to having to use their heads to get ahead, they had the weight of the whole race sitting there. You needed two heads for that. Whitepeople believed that whatever the manners, under every dark skin was a jungle. Swift unnavigable waters, swinging screaming baboons, sleeping snakes, red gums ready for their sweet white blood. In a way, he thought, they were right. The more coloredpeople spent their strength trying to convince them how gentle they were, how clever and loving, how human, the more they used themselves up to persuade the whites of something Negroes believed could not be questioned, the deeper and more tangled the jungle grew inside. But it wasn't the jungle blacks brought with them to this place from the other (livable) place. It was the jungle whitefolks planted in them. And it grew. It spread. In, through and after life, it spread, until it invaded the whites who made it. Touched them, every one. Changed and altered them. Made them bloody, silly, worse than even they wanted to be, so scared were they of the jungle they had made. The screaming baboon lived under their own white skin; the red gums were their own.


The time shifts, too, and unclearly. Not that it's a criticism, but you have to learn how to read it (or rather, to understand how it's written). The events of the story, such as it is, are pretty straightforward. It's just that the novel is not the retelling of the events, but painting the picture around it. It reads like an epic prose poem more than a novel.

So that's why it took me like a month to read this book. That said, it's a really good book and it's worth reading. It's rewarding. It also needs a better cover:

It has other (better) covers, of course, but this was the one available in my library. It looks like it would be better on a cheesy 80s erotic thriller novel than an important piece of Black literature.

Sunday, September 29, 2013

101 in 1001

I've been pretty productive since my last update!


Completed:

Rather unexpectedly, I completed a goal that I considered a stretch: finding out my great-grandmother's maiden name. (4 - 1) I also stumbled on to a whole bunch of genealogical bonus information as well. I suspect making heads and tails of that will be an item for my next list!


In Progress:

Another update and comment. (1 - 3) ( 7 - 4).

I finished Beloved, which was a difficult but rewarding read. (3 - 3) I'm still reading The Second Sex. (9 - 2)

I also finished and mailed the geographic coordinates necklace and bracelet set for my friend, Leah. (2 - 3)

I watched the British-German movie Hanna yesterday. (9 - 5) It was really good, I'd highly recommend it! Can I call it an art house thriller? Does that make any sense?


Failed:

None!


Rest of the list after the jump.



Wednesday, September 25, 2013

New Item Available: Geographic Coordinates Jewelry!

Inspired by a friend's upcoming wedding, I'll now be offering geographic coordinates jewelry!



Pictured above are an amethyst and chaorite necklace (about 22 inches in length) and an amethyst and chaorite double stand bracelet (about 8 inches in length). These are great commemorative gifts for when you want to remember specific place. In this case, the two places are the bar where my friend and her fiancé met (in Seoul, South Korea) and where he proposed to her (in Thailand).

I'm excited to be able to offer this design to you guys (why haven't I thought of it before?) and to be able to reach to an audience that might not have been interested in numbers jewelry otherwise. I also can't wait to make one for myself. The location? 37.7344,127.048907: where I lived in Uijeongbu.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Birthstones: Contemporary History

(This is a sequel to a previous post: Birthstones: Early History. You don't need to read it to understand this post, but in case you were curious, there it is!)


Image courtesy Alice Mary Herden

While the early history of birthstones is fascinating (especially for closet occult nerds like me), it's more or less unrelated to birthstones as they're used today. The association of specific stones to specific Gregorian months can only be traced, with any certainty, to the 19th century.

In 1870, Tiffany & Co. published a set of poems (without attribution) that connected each month to a different personality failing or piece of bad luck and a corresponding stone that would guard against. They are as follows:

By her who in [January] is born
No gem save garnets should be worn;
They will ensure her constancy,
True friendship, and fidelity. 
The February-born shall find
Sincerity and peace of mind,
Freedom from passion and from care,
If they an amethyst will wear. 
Who in this world of ours their eyes
In March first open shall be wise,
In days of peril firm and brave,
And wear a bloodstone to their grave. 
She who from April dates her years,
Diamonds shall wear, lest bitter tears
For vain repentance flow; this stone,
Emblem of innocence, is known. 
Who first beholds the light of day
In spring's sweet flowery month of May
And wears an emerald all her life
Shall be a loved and happy wife. 
Who comes with summer to this earth,
And owes to June her hour of birth,
With ring of agate on her hand
Can health, wealth, and long life command. 
The glowing ruby shall adorn,
Those who in July are born;
Then they'll be exempt and free
From love's doubts and anxiety. 
Wear a sardonyx or for thee,
No conjugal felicity;
The August-born without this stone,
`Tis said, must live unloved and lone. 
A maiden born when September leaves
Are rustling in September's breeze,
A sapphire on her brow should bind
`Twill cure diseases of the mind. 
October's child is born for woe,
And life's vicissitudes must know,
But lay an opal on her breast,
And hope will lull those woes to rest. 
Who first comes to this world below
With drear November's fog and snow,
Should prize the topaz's amber hue,
Emblem of friends and lovers true. 
If cold December gave you birth,
The month of snow and ice and mirth,
Place on your hand a turquoise blue;
Success will bless whate'er you do.
Some claim that these poems predate Tiffany & Co., but as no record of them exists prior to the 1870 publication date, it's probably safe to assume that Tiffany released them as a marketing tool.

The premise of advertising is simple: convince you that you have a need, and then convince you that Product X will fit that need. Obviously these poems do just that. The date of the poems' release also coincides neatly with the Second Industrial Revolution as well as the rise of a middle class—a class of people with disposable income to spend.

In other words, birthstones as we know them today come into existence for the sole purpose of selling jewelry.

Whether inspired by the Tiffany & Co. poems or for other reasons, the American National Association of Jewelers met in Kansas City and put together the "official" list. This is the one most often used by jewelers and jewelry stores:

Birthstones (Kansas City, 1912)

However, this list has been revised a couple of times, As you can see, not much has changed.

Birthstones (Kansas City, 2002)

It's also important to note that Great Britain still maintains its own standards (determined by Britain's National Association of Goldsmiths). They're nearly identical to the Kansas City list, with a few exceptions. British goldsmiths never added alexandrite as an option for June, but they do offer alternatives to some of the more expensive stones on the list (rock crystal for April, chrysoprase for May, and carnelian for July). Lapis lazuli is also an alternative for September instead of December (while the British list also omits blue zircon as an option for December).

That said, the mystical origins of birthstones haven't been totally lost to time. Many people today choose their birthstone by their Sun sign rather than their birth month. Mineralogist G. F. Kunz assembled a whole host of different lists and associations (many of which I discussed in the "Early History" post) in a book called Curious Lore of Precious Stones in 1913. He devotes an entire chapter to "Planetary and Astral Influences of Precious Stones." One list of associations is taken from an old (though undated and unreferenced, probably dates back to the Renaissance and Europe) figure included in Chapter X, opposite page 342:
While most of the stones are the same as the Kansas list, you can see their placement has shifted in some cases. May's emerald now goes to the June and July sign of Cancer; September's sapphire is the April and May sign of Taurus, and so forth. He traces the same list back to ancient Persia, along with a set of unattributed poems (which I won't reproduce here).

On page 347 he also includes "an old Spanish list of the gems of the zodiacal signs" which he theorizes "represents Arabic tradition" and thus varies from the list above.
  • Aries: Crystal (presumably just plain quartz?)
  • Taurus: Ruby, Diamond
  • Gemini: Sapphire
  • Cancer: Agate, Beryl
  • Leo: Topaz
  • Virgo: Magnet (presumably magnetite or lodestone?)
  • Libra: Jasper
  • Scorpio: Garnet
  • Sagittarius: Emerald
  • Capricorn: Chalcedony
  • Aquarius: Amethyst
  • Pisces: [none given in text]
Numerous other associations are given as well: days of the week, constellations, fixed stars, planets, dreams, and more. However, that's more than I have time for here. Maybe later on in the series, but for now I'll focus on the stones in the Kansas City list from 2002. First up (and next entry in the series): January's birthstone, garnet.

Sunday, September 22, 2013

101 in 1001

Things have been done and such!


Completed:

None!


In Progress:

Another update and comment. (1 - 3) ( 7 - 4).

I'm still reading Beloved, as well as The Second Sex. (3 - 3) (9 - 2)

I also got 10,000 more grains in FreeRice. (12 - 7)

I finished reading and critiquing one out of the two screenplays I have to read from my friend Bryan. After the second one (and the synopses he sent me), I'll consider the goal done. (7 - 3)


Failed:

None!


Rest of the list after the jump.